erwan/phd-thesis
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Typo

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Erwan Normand
2024-06-28 00:21:02 +02:00
parent ae481d4584
commit aa6961230e
6 changed files with 13 additions and 13 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
3-manipulation/visual-hand/2-method.tex
View File

@@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ The compiled application ran directly on the HoloLens~2 at \qty{60}{FPS}.
The default 3D hand model from MRTK was used for all visual hand renderings. The default 3D hand model from MRTK was used for all visual hand renderings.
% %
By changing the material properties of this hand model, we were able to achieve the six renderings shown in \figref{shands}. By changing the material properties of this hand model, we were able to achieve the six renderings shown in \figref{hands}.
% %
A calibration was performed for every participant, so as to best adapt the size of the visual hand rendering to their real hand. A calibration was performed for every participant, so as to best adapt the size of the visual hand rendering to their real hand.
% %

8
3-manipulation/visual-hand/3-1-push.tex
View File

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
\subsubsection{Push Task} \subsection{Push Task}
\label{sec:push} \label{sec:push}
\subsubsubsection{Completion Time} \subsubsection{Completion Time}
\label{sec:push_tct} \label{sec:push_tct}
On the time to complete a trial, there were two statistically significant effects: % On the time to complete a trial, there were two statistically significant effects: %
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ Three groups of targets volumes were identified:
and (3) back N and NW targets were the slowest (\p{0.04}). and (3) back N and NW targets were the slowest (\p{0.04}).
\subsubsubsection{Contacts} \subsubsection{Contacts}
\label{sec:push_contacts_count} \label{sec:push_contacts_count}
On the number of contacts, there were two statistically significant effects: % On the number of contacts, there were two statistically significant effects: %
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ This indicates how effective a visual hand rendering is: a lower result indicate
Targets on the left (W) and the right (E, SW) were easier to reach than the back ones (N, NW, \pinf{0.001}). Targets on the left (W) and the right (E, SW) were easier to reach than the back ones (N, NW, \pinf{0.001}).
\subsubsubsection{Time per Contact} \subsubsection{Time per Contact}
\label{sec:push_time_per_contact} \label{sec:push_time_per_contact}
On the mean time spent on each contact, there were two statistically significant effects: % On the mean time spent on each contact, there were two statistically significant effects: %

10
3-manipulation/visual-hand/3-2-grasp.tex
View File

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
\subsubsection{Grasp Task} \subsection{Grasp Task}
\label{sec:grasp} \label{sec:grasp}
\subsubsubsection{Completion Time} \subsubsection{Completion Time}
\label{sec:grasp_tct} \label{sec:grasp_tct}
On the time to complete a trial, there was one statistically significant effect % On the time to complete a trial, there was one statistically significant effect %
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ but not of Hand (\anova{5}{2868}{1.8}, \p{0.1}, see \figref{results/Grasp-Comple
Targets on the back and the left (N, NW, and W) were slower than targets on the front (SW, S, and SE, \p{0.003}) {except for} NE (back-right) which was also fast. Targets on the back and the left (N, NW, and W) were slower than targets on the front (SW, S, and SE, \p{0.003}) {except for} NE (back-right) which was also fast.
\subsubsubsection{Contacts} \subsubsection{Contacts}
\label{sec:grasp_contacts_count} \label{sec:grasp_contacts_count}
On the number of contacts, there were two statistically significant effects: % On the number of contacts, there were two statistically significant effects: %
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ But, surprisingly, only Tips and Mesh were statistically significantly better, n
Targets on the back and left were more difficult (N, NW, and W) than targets on the front (SW, S, and SE, \pinf{0.001}). Targets on the back and left were more difficult (N, NW, and W) than targets on the front (SW, S, and SE, \pinf{0.001}).
\subsubsubsection{Time per Contact} \subsubsection{Time per Contact}
\label{sec:grasp_time_per_contact} \label{sec:grasp_time_per_contact}
On the mean time spent on each contact, there were two statistically significant effects: % On the mean time spent on each contact, there were two statistically significant effects: %
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ The Tips rendering seemed to provide one of the best feedback for the grasping,
This time was the shortest on the front S than on the other target volumes (\pinf{0.001}). This time was the shortest on the front S than on the other target volumes (\pinf{0.001}).
\subsubsubsection{Grip Aperture} \subsubsection{Grip Aperture}
\label{sec:grasp_grip_aperture} \label{sec:grasp_grip_aperture}
On the average distance between the thumb's fingertip and the other fingertips during grasping, there were two On the average distance between the thumb's fingertip and the other fingertips during grasping, there were two

2
3-manipulation/visual-hand/3-3-ranks.tex
View File

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
\subsubsection{Ranking} \subsection{Ranking}
\label{sec:ranks} \label{sec:ranks}
\begin{subfigs}{ranks}{% \begin{subfigs}{ranks}{%

2
3-manipulation/visual-hand/3-4-questions.tex
View File

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
\subsubsection{Questionnaire} \subsection{Questionnaire}
\label{sec:questions} \label{sec:questions}
\begin{subfigswide}{questions}{% \begin{subfigswide}{questions}{%

2
3-manipulation/visual-hand/visual-hand.tex
View File

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
\chapter{Visual Rendering of the Hand in Augmented Reality} \chapter{Visual Rendering of the Hand in Augmented Reality}
\mainlabel{visual-hand} \mainlabel{visual_hand}
\chaptertoc \chaptertoc