Style visuo-haptic hand result figures

This commit is contained in:
2024-11-04 14:36:14 +01:00
parent cd12783293
commit 7cc98f5f55
23 changed files with 12 additions and 15 deletions

View File

@@ -39,9 +39,8 @@ This indicates, as for the \chapref{visual_hand}, more confidence with a visual
\item Mean time spent on each contact. \item Mean time spent on each contact.
\item Mean time spent on each contact. \item Mean time spent on each contact.
] ]
\subfig[0.4]{results/Push-CompletionTime-Location-Overall-Means} \subfig[0.24]{results/Push-CompletionTime-Location-Overall-Means}
\subfig[0.4]{results/Push-Contacts-Location-Overall-Means} \subfig[0.24]{results/Push-Contacts-Location-Overall-Means}
\par \subfig[0.24]{results/Push-TimePerContact-Location-Overall-Means}
\subfig[0.4]{results/Push-TimePerContact-Location-Overall-Means} \subfig[0.175]{results/Push-TimePerContact-Hand-Overall-Means}
\subfig[0.4]{results/Push-TimePerContact-Hand-Overall-Means}
\end{subfigs} \end{subfigs}

View File

@@ -48,9 +48,8 @@ and shorter with \level{RF} than with \level{LB} or \level{LF} (\pinf{0.001}).
\item Time spent on each contact. \item Time spent on each contact.
\item Distance between thumb and the other fingertips when grasping. \item Distance between thumb and the other fingertips when grasping.
] ]
\subfig[0.4]{results/Grasp-CompletionTime-Location-Overall-Means} \subfig[0.24]{results/Grasp-CompletionTime-Location-Overall-Means}
\subfig[0.4]{results/Grasp-Contacts-Location-Overall-Means} \subfig[0.24]{results/Grasp-Contacts-Location-Overall-Means}
\par \subfig[0.24]{results/Grasp-TimePerContact-Location-Overall-Means}
\subfig[0.4]{results/Grasp-TimePerContact-Location-Overall-Means} \subfig[0.24]{results/Grasp-GripAperture-Location-Overall-Means}
\subfig[0.4]{results/Grasp-GripAperture-Location-Overall-Means}
\end{subfigs} \end{subfigs}

View File

@@ -64,9 +64,8 @@ And \level{Opposite} more than \level{Nowhere} (\p{0.03}).
Higher is better for \textbf{(a)} vibrotactile rendering rating, \textbf{(c)} usefulness and \textbf{(c)} fatigue. Higher is better for \textbf{(a)} vibrotactile rendering rating, \textbf{(c)} usefulness and \textbf{(c)} fatigue.
Lower is better for \textbf{(d)} workload. Lower is better for \textbf{(d)} workload.
] ]
\subfig[0.4]{results/Question-Vibration Rating-Positioning-Overall} \subfig[0.24]{results/Question-Vibration Rating-Positioning-Overall}
\subfig[0.4]{results/Question-Workload-Positioning-Overall} \subfig[0.24]{results/Question-Workload-Positioning-Overall}
\par \subfig[0.24]{results/Question-Usefulness-Positioning-Overall}
\subfig[0.4]{results/Question-Usefulness-Positioning-Overall} \subfig[0.24]{results/Question-Realism-Positioning-Overall}
\subfig[0.4]{results/Question-Realism-Positioning-Overall}
\end{subfigs} \end{subfigs}