Style visuo-haptic hand result figures

This commit is contained in:
erwan committed 2024-11-04 14:36:14 +01:00
1 parent cd12783293
commit 7cc98f5f55
23 files changed
+12 -15

No files matched your search

@@ -39,9 +39,8 @@ This indicates, as for the \chapref{visual_hand}, more confidence with a visual
\item Mean time spent on each contact. \item Mean time spent on each contact.
\item Mean time spent on each contact. \item Mean time spent on each contact.
] ]
\subfig[0.4]{results/Push-CompletionTime-Location-Overall-Means} \subfig[0.24]{results/Push-CompletionTime-Location-Overall-Means}
\subfig[0.4]{results/Push-Contacts-Location-Overall-Means} \subfig[0.24]{results/Push-Contacts-Location-Overall-Means}
\par \subfig[0.24]{results/Push-TimePerContact-Location-Overall-Means}
\subfig[0.4]{results/Push-TimePerContact-Location-Overall-Means} \subfig[0.175]{results/Push-TimePerContact-Hand-Overall-Means}
\subfig[0.4]{results/Push-TimePerContact-Hand-Overall-Means}
\end{subfigs} \end{subfigs}
@@ -48,9 +48,8 @@ and shorter with \level{RF} than with \level{LB} or \level{LF} (\pinf{0.001}).
\item Time spent on each contact. \item Time spent on each contact.
\item Distance between thumb and the other fingertips when grasping. \item Distance between thumb and the other fingertips when grasping.
] ]
\subfig[0.4]{results/Grasp-CompletionTime-Location-Overall-Means} \subfig[0.24]{results/Grasp-CompletionTime-Location-Overall-Means}
\subfig[0.4]{results/Grasp-Contacts-Location-Overall-Means} \subfig[0.24]{results/Grasp-Contacts-Location-Overall-Means}
\par \subfig[0.24]{results/Grasp-TimePerContact-Location-Overall-Means}
\subfig[0.4]{results/Grasp-TimePerContact-Location-Overall-Means} \subfig[0.24]{results/Grasp-GripAperture-Location-Overall-Means}
\subfig[0.4]{results/Grasp-GripAperture-Location-Overall-Means}
\end{subfigs} \end{subfigs}
@@ -64,9 +64,8 @@ And \level{Opposite} more than \level{Nowhere} (\p{0.03}).
Higher is better for \textbf{(a)} vibrotactile rendering rating, \textbf{(c)} usefulness and \textbf{(c)} fatigue. Higher is better for \textbf{(a)} vibrotactile rendering rating, \textbf{(c)} usefulness and \textbf{(c)} fatigue.
Lower is better for \textbf{(d)} workload. Lower is better for \textbf{(d)} workload.
] ]
\subfig[0.4]{results/Question-Vibration Rating-Positioning-Overall} \subfig[0.24]{results/Question-Vibration Rating-Positioning-Overall}
\subfig[0.4]{results/Question-Workload-Positioning-Overall} \subfig[0.24]{results/Question-Workload-Positioning-Overall}
\par \subfig[0.24]{results/Question-Usefulness-Positioning-Overall}
\subfig[0.4]{results/Question-Usefulness-Positioning-Overall} \subfig[0.24]{results/Question-Realism-Positioning-Overall}
\subfig[0.4]{results/Question-Realism-Positioning-Overall}
\end{subfigs} \end{subfigs}