Typo in percent
This commit is contained in:
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ We considered two representative contact vibration techniques, \ie two ways of r
|
||||
The implementation of these two techniques have been tuned according to the results of a preliminary experiment.
|
||||
Three participants were asked to carry out a series of push and grasp tasks similar to those used in the actual experiment.
|
||||
Results showed that \percent{95} of the contacts between the fingertip and the virtual cube happened at speeds below \qty{1.5}{\m\per\s}.
|
||||
We also measured the perceived minimum amplitude to be 15~\% (\qty{0.6}{\g}) of the maximum amplitude of the motors we used.
|
||||
We also measured the perceived minimum amplitude to be \percent{15} (\qty{0.6}{\g}) of the maximum amplitude of the motors we used.
|
||||
For this reason, we designed the Impact vibration technique (Impa) so that contact speeds from \qtyrange{0}{1.5}{\m\per\s} are linearly mapped into \qtyrange{15}{100}{\%} amplitude commands for the motors.
|
||||
Similarly, we designed the distance vibration technique (Dist) so that interpenetrations from \qtyrange{0}{2.5}{\cm} are linearly mapped into \qtyrange{15}{100}{\%} amplitude commands for the motors, recalling that the virtual cube has an edge of \qty{5}{\cm}.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user