Auto add chapter as prefix to labels

2-perception/ar-textures/3-results.tex

@@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
 \section{Results}
-\sublabel{results}
+\label{sec:results}
 
 \subsection{Textures Matching}
-\sublabel{results_matching}
+\label{sec:results_matching}
 
 \subsubsection{Confusion Matrix}
-\sublabel{results_matching_confusion_matrix}
+\label{sec:results_matching_confusion_matrix}
 
 \begin{subfigs}{results_matching_ranking}{%
         (Left) Confusion matrix of the matching task, with the presented visual textures as columns and the selected haptic texture in proportion as rows. %
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ Another explanation could be that the participants had difficulties to estimate
 Indeed, many participants explained that they tried to identify or imagine the roughness of a given visual texture then to select the most plausible haptic texture, in terms of frequency and/or amplitude of vibrations.
 
 \subsubsection{Completion Time}
-\sublabel{results_matching_time}
+\label{sec:results_matching_time}
 
 To verify that the difficulty with all the visual textures was the same on the matching task, the \textit{Completion Time} of a trial, \ie the time between the visual texture display and the haptic texture selection, was analyzed.
 %
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ No statistical significant effect of \textit{Visual Texture} was found (\anova{8
 
 
 \subsection{Textures Ranking}
-\sublabel{results_ranking}
+\label{sec:results_ranking}
 
 \figref{results_matching_ranking} (right) presents the results of the three rankings of the haptic textures alone, the visual textures alone, and the visuo-haptic texture pairs.
 %
@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ These results indicate, with \figref{results_matching_ranking} (right), that the
 
 
 \subsection{Perceived Similarity of Visual and Haptic Textures}
-\sublabel{results_similarity}
+\label{sec:results_similarity}
 
 \begin{subfigs}{results_similarity}{%
         (Left) Correspondence analysis of the matching task confusion matrix (see \figref{results_matching_ranking}, left).
@@ -155,7 +155,7 @@ This shows that the participants consistently identified the roughness of each v
 
 
 \subsection{Questionnaire}
-\sublabel{results_questions}
+\label{sec:results_questions}
 
 \begin{subfigs}{results_questions}{%
         Boxplots of the 7-item Likert scale question results (1=Not at all, 7=Extremely) %