Fix warnings

This commit is contained in:
2024-09-30 14:35:32 +02:00
parent 85f7d96a21
commit f345dcf94e
9 changed files with 7 additions and 7 deletions

View File

@@ -70,8 +70,8 @@ We considered the same two \level{Push} and \level{Grasp} tasks as described in
\item Push task: pushing the virtual cube along a table towards a target placed on the same surface.
\item Grasp task: grasping and lifting the virtual cube towards a target placed on a \qty{20}{\cm} higher plane.
]
\subfig[0.45]{method/task-push}
\subfig[0.45]{method/task-grasp}
\subfig[0.45]{method/task-push-2}
\subfig[0.45]{method/task-grasp-2}
\end{subfigs}
To account for learning and fatigue effects, the order of the \factor{Positioning} conditions were counter-balanced using a balanced \numproduct{10 x 10} Latin square.
@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ This design led to a total of 5 vibrotactile positionings \x 2 vibration contact
\subsection{Apparatus and Procedure}
\label{apparatus}
Apparatus and experimental procedure were similar to the \chapref{visual_hand}, as described in \secref[visual_hand]{apparatus} and \secref[visual_hand]{protocol}, respectively.
Apparatus and experimental procedure were similar to the \chapref{visual_hand}, as described in \secref[visual_hand]{apparatus} and \secref[visual_hand]{procedure}, respectively.
We report here only the differences.
We employed the same vibrotactile device used by \cite{devigne2020power}.