erwan/phd-thesis
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Fix acronyms

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Erwan Normand
2024-09-24 15:47:33 +02:00
parent 2dad3efdd0
commit ef188c1993
26 changed files with 165 additions and 159 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

6
3-manipulation/visuo-haptic-hand/4-discussion.tex
View File

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
\section{Discussion}
\label{discussion}
We evaluated sixteen visuo-haptic renderings of the hand, in the same two virtual object manipulation tasks in AR as in the first experiment, as the combination of two vibrotactile contact techniques provided at four delocalized positions on the hand with the two most representative visual hand renderings established in the first experiment.
We evaluated sixteen visuo-haptic renderings of the hand, in the same two virtual object manipulation tasks in \AR as in the first experiment, as the combination of two vibrotactile contact techniques provided at four delocalized positions on the hand with the two most representative visual hand renderings established in the first experiment.
In the Push task, vibrotactile haptic hand rendering has been proven beneficial with the Proximal positioning, which registered a low completion time, but detrimental with the Fingertips positioning, which performed worse (\figref{results/Push-CompletionTime-Location-Overall-Means}) than the Proximal and Opposite (on the contralateral hand) positionings.
%
@@ -59,11 +59,11 @@ It is also worth noting that the improved hand tracking and grasp helper improve
%
This improvement could also be the reason for the smaller differences between the Skeleton and the None visual hand renderings in this second experiment.
In summary, the positioning of the vibrotactile haptic rendering of the hand affected on the performance and experience of users manipulating virtual objects with their bare hands in AR.
In summary, the positioning of the vibrotactile haptic rendering of the hand affected on the performance and experience of users manipulating virtual objects with their bare hands in \AR.
%
The closer the vibrotactile hand rendering was to the point of contact, the better it was perceived in terms of effectiveness, usefulness, and realism.
%
These subjective appreciations of wearable haptic hand rendering for manipulating virtual objects in AR were also observed by \textcite{maisto2017evaluation} and \textcite{meli2018combining}.
These subjective appreciations of wearable haptic hand rendering for manipulating virtual objects in \AR were also observed by \textcite{maisto2017evaluation} and \textcite{meli2018combining}.
%
However, the best performance was obtained with the farthest positioning on the contralateral hand, which is somewhat surprising.
%