erwan/phd-thesis
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Fix vh-hand chapter

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Erwan Normand
2024-09-25 09:00:03 +02:00
parent 5ea0d208ae
commit e80908b7f5
7 changed files with 104 additions and 113 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

31
3-manipulation/visuo-haptic-hand/3-2-grasp.tex
View File

@@ -8,14 +8,13 @@ On the time to complete a trial, there were two statistically significant effect
Positioning (\anova{4}{3990}{13.6}, \pinf{0.001}, see \figref{results/Grasp-CompletionTime-Location-Overall-Means}) %
and Target (\anova{3}{3990}{18.8}, \pinf{0.001}).
%
Opposite was faster than Fingertips (\qty{+19}{\%}, \pinf{0.001}), Proximal (\qty{+13}{\%}, \pinf{0.001}), Wrist (\qty{+14}{\%}, \pinf{0.001}), and No Vibrations (\qty{+8}{\%}, \p{0.03}).
\level{\level{Opposite}} was faster than \level{Fingertips} (\qty{+19}{\%}, \pinf{0.001}), \level{Proximal} (\qty{+13}{\%}, \pinf{0.001}), \level{Wrist} (\qty{+14}{\%}, \pinf{0.001}), and \level{Nowhere} (\qty{+8}{\%}, \p{0.03}).
%
No Vibrations was faster than Fingertips (\qty{+11}{\%}, \pinf{0.001}).
\level{Nowhere} was faster than \level{Fingertips} (\qty{+11}{\%}, \pinf{0.001}).
%
SE was faster than NE (\pinf{0.001}), NW (\pinf{0.001}), and SW (\pinf{0.001});
\level{RF} was faster than \level{RB} (\pinf{0.001}), \level{LB} (\pinf{0.001}), and \level{LF} (\pinf{0.001});
%
and SW was faster than NE (\p{0.03}).
and \level{LF} was faster than \level{RB} (\p{0.03}).
\subsubsection{Contacts}
\label{grasp_contacts_count}
@@ -24,12 +23,11 @@ On the number of contacts, there were two statistically significant effects: %
Positioning (\anova{4}{3990}{15.1}, \pinf{0.001}, see \figref{results/Grasp-Contacts-Location-Overall-Means}) %
and Target (\anova{3}{3990}{7.6}, \pinf{0.001}).
%
Fewer contacts were made with Opposite than with Fingertips (\qty{-26}{\%}, \pinf{0.001}), Proximal (\qty{-17}{\%}, \pinf{0.001}), or Wrist (\qty{-12}{\%}, \p{0.002});
Fewer contacts were made with \level{Opposite} than with \level{Fingertips} (\qty{-26}{\%}, \pinf{0.001}), \level{Proximal} (\qty{-17}{\%}, \pinf{0.001}), or \level{Wrist} (\qty{-12}{\%}, \p{0.002});
%
but more with Fingertips than with Wrist (\qty{+13}{\%}, \p{0.002}) or No Vibrations (\qty{+17}{\%}, \pinf{0.001}).
but more with \level{Fingertips} than with \level{Wrist} (\qty{+13}{\%}, \p{0.002}) or \level{Nowhere} (\qty{+17}{\%}, \pinf{0.001}).
%
It was also easier on SW than on NE (\pinf{0.001}), NW (\p{0.006}), or SE (\p{0.03}).
It was also easier on \level{LF} than on \level{RB} (\pinf{0.001}), \level{LB} (\p{0.006}), or \level{RF} (\p{0.03}).
\subsubsection{Time per Contact}
\label{grasp_time_per_contact}
@@ -38,12 +36,11 @@ On the mean time spent on each contact, there were two statistically significant
Positioning (\anova{4}{3990}{2.9}, \p{0.02}, see \figref{results/Grasp-TimePerContact-Location-Overall-Means}) %
and Target (\anova{3}{3990}{62.6}, \pinf{0.001}).
%
It was shorter with Fingertips than with Opposite (\qty{+7}{\%}, \p{0.01}).
It was shorter with \level{Fingertips} than with \level{Opposite} (\qty{+7}{\%}, \p{0.01}).
%
It was also shorter on SE than on NE, NW or SW (\pinf{0.001});
It was also shorter on \level{RF} than on \level{RB}, \level{LB} or \level{LF} (\pinf{0.001});
%
but longer on SW than on NE or NW (\pinf{0.001}).
but longer on \level{LF} than on \level{RB} or \level{LB} (\pinf{0.001}).
\subsubsection{Grip Aperture}
\label{grasp_grip_aperture}
@@ -53,10 +50,10 @@ statistically significant effects: %
Positioning (\anova{4}{3990}{30.1}, \pinf{0.001}, see \figref{results/Grasp-GripAperture-Location-Overall-Means}) %
and Target (\anova{3}{3990}{19.9}, \pinf{0.001}).
%
It was longer with Fingertips than with Proximal (\pinf{0.001}), Wrist (\pinf{0.001}), Opposite (\pinf{0.001}), or No Vibrations (\pinf{0.001});
It was longer with \level{Fingertips} than with \level{Proximal} (\pinf{0.001}), \level{Wrist} (\pinf{0.001}), \level{Opposite} (\pinf{0.001}), or \level{Nowhere} (\pinf{0.001});
%
and longer with Proximal than with Wrist (\pinf{0.001}) or No Vibrations (\pinf{0.001}).
and longer with \level{Proximal} than with \level{Wrist} (\pinf{0.001}) or \level{Nowhere} (\pinf{0.001}).
%
But, it was shorter with NE than with NW or SW (\pinf{0.001});
But, it was shorter with \level{RB} than with \level{LB} or \level{LF} (\pinf{0.001});
%
and shorter with SE than with NW or SW (\pinf{0.001}).
and shorter with \level{RF} than with \level{LB} or \level{LF} (\pinf{0.001}).