Use \autocite
This commit is contained in:
@@ -2,23 +2,23 @@
|
||||
\sublabel{experiment}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{subfigs}{setup}{%
|
||||
(Left) The nine visuo-haptic textures used in the user study, selected from the HaTT database~\cite{culbertson2014one}. %
|
||||
The texture names were never shown, so as to prevent the use of the user's visual or haptic memory of the textures.
|
||||
(Middle) Experimental setup. %
|
||||
Participant sat in front of the tangible surfaces, which were augmented with visual textures displayed by the HoloLens~2 AR headset and haptic roughness textures rendered by the vibrotactile haptic device placed on the middle index phalanx. %
|
||||
A webcam above the surfaces tracked the finger movements.
|
||||
(Right) First person view of the user study, as seen through the immersive AR headset HoloLens~2. %
|
||||
The visual texture overlays are statically displayed on the surfaces, allowing the user to move around to view them from different angles. %
|
||||
The haptic roughness texture is generated based on HaTT data-driven texture models and finger speed, and it is rendered on the middle index phalanx as it slides on the considered surface.%
|
||||
}
|
||||
\subfig[0.32]{experiment/textures}%
|
||||
\subfig[0.32]{experiment/setup}%
|
||||
\subfig[0.32]{experiment/view}%
|
||||
(Left) The nine visuo-haptic textures used in the user study, selected from the HaTT database~\autocite{culbertson2014one}. %
|
||||
The texture names were never shown, so as to prevent the use of the user's visual or haptic memory of the textures.
|
||||
(Middle) Experimental setup. %
|
||||
Participant sat in front of the tangible surfaces, which were augmented with visual textures displayed by the HoloLens~2 AR headset and haptic roughness textures rendered by the vibrotactile haptic device placed on the middle index phalanx. %
|
||||
A webcam above the surfaces tracked the finger movements.
|
||||
(Right) First person view of the user study, as seen through the immersive AR headset HoloLens~2. %
|
||||
The visual texture overlays are statically displayed on the surfaces, allowing the user to move around to view them from different angles. %
|
||||
The haptic roughness texture is generated based on HaTT data-driven texture models and finger speed, and it is rendered on the middle index phalanx as it slides on the considered surface.%
|
||||
}
|
||||
\subfig[0.32]{experiment/textures}%
|
||||
\subfig[0.32]{experiment/setup}%
|
||||
\subfig[0.32]{experiment/view}%
|
||||
\end{subfigs}
|
||||
|
||||
The user study aimed at analyzing the user perception of tangible surfaces when augmented through a visuo-haptic texture using AR and vibrotactile haptic feedback provided on the finger touching the surfaces.
|
||||
%
|
||||
Nine representative visuo-haptic texture pairs from the HaTT database~\cite{culbertson2014one} were investigated in two tasks:
|
||||
Nine representative visuo-haptic texture pairs from the HaTT database~\autocite{culbertson2014one} were investigated in two tasks:
|
||||
%
|
||||
(1) a matching task, where participants had to find the haptic texture that best matched a given visual texture; and (2) a ranking task, where participants had to rank only the haptic textures, only the visual textures, and the visuo-haptic texture pairs according to their perceived roughness.
|
||||
%
|
||||
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ Our objective is to assess which haptic textures were associated with which visu
|
||||
\subsection{The textures}
|
||||
\sublabel{textures}
|
||||
|
||||
The 100 visuo-haptic texture pairs of the HaTT database~\cite{culbertson2014one} were preliminary tested and compared using AR and vibrotactile haptic feedback on the finger on a tangible surface.
|
||||
The 100 visuo-haptic texture pairs of the HaTT database~\autocite{culbertson2014one} were preliminary tested and compared using AR and vibrotactile haptic feedback on the finger on a tangible surface.
|
||||
%
|
||||
These texture models were chosen as they are visuo-haptic representations of a wide range of real textures that are publicly available online.
|
||||
%
|
||||
@@ -52,17 +52,17 @@ Positioned \qty{20}{\cm} above the surfaces, a webcam (StreamCam, Logitech) film
|
||||
%
|
||||
The visual textures were displayed on the tangible surfaces using the HoloLens~2 OST-AR headset (see \figref{setup}, middle and right) within a \qtyproduct{43 x 29}{\degree} field of view at \qty{60}{\Hz}; a set of empirical tests enabled us to choose the best rendering characteristics in terms of transparency and brightness for the visual textures, that were used throughout the user study.
|
||||
%
|
||||
When a haptic texture was touched, a \qty{48}{kHz} audio signal was generated using the corresponding HaTT haptic texture model and the measured tangential speed of the finger, using the rendering procedure described in Culbertson \etal~\cite{culbertson2014modeling}.
|
||||
When a haptic texture was touched, a \qty{48}{kHz} audio signal was generated using the corresponding HaTT haptic texture model and the measured tangential speed of the finger, using the rendering procedure described in Culbertson \etal~\autocite{culbertson2014modeling}.
|
||||
%
|
||||
The normal force on the texture was assumed to be constant at \qty{1.2}{\N} to generate the audio signal from the model, as Culbertson \etal~\cite{culbertson2015should}, who found that the HaTT textures can be rendered using only the speed as input without decreasing their perceived realism.
|
||||
The normal force on the texture was assumed to be constant at \qty{1.2}{\N} to generate the audio signal from the model, as Culbertson \etal~\autocite{culbertson2015should}, who found that the HaTT textures can be rendered using only the speed as input without decreasing their perceived realism.
|
||||
%
|
||||
An amplifier (XY-502, not branded) converted this audio signal to a current transmitted to the vibrotactile voice-coil actuator (HapCoil-One, Actronika), that was encased in a 3D-printed plastic shell firmly attached to the middle index phalanx of the participant's dominant hand, similarly to previous studies~\cite{asano2015vibrotactile,friesen2024perceived}.
|
||||
An amplifier (XY-502, not branded) converted this audio signal to a current transmitted to the vibrotactile voice-coil actuator (HapCoil-One, Actronika), that was encased in a 3D-printed plastic shell firmly attached to the middle index phalanx of the participant's dominant hand, similarly to previous studies~\autocite{asano2015vibrotactile,friesen2024perceived}.
|
||||
%
|
||||
This voice-coil actuator was chosen for its wide frequency range (\qtyrange{10}{1000}{\Hz}) and its relatively low acceleration distortion, as specified by the manufacturer\footnoteurl{https://www.actronika.com/haptic-solutions}.
|
||||
%
|
||||
Overall latency was measured to \qty{46 \pm 6}{\ms}, as a result of latency in image acquisition \qty{16 \pm 1}{\ms}, fiducial marker detection \qty{8 \pm 3}{\ms}, network synchronization \qty{4 \pm 1}{\ms}, audio sampling \qty{3 \pm 1}{\ms}, and the vibrotactile actuator latency (\qty{15}{\ms}, as specified by the manufacturer\footnotemark[5]).
|
||||
%
|
||||
This latency was below the \qty{60}{\ms} threshold for vibrotactile feedback \cite{okamoto2009detectability} and was not noticed by the participants.
|
||||
This latency was below the \qty{60}{\ms} threshold for vibrotactile feedback \autocite{okamoto2009detectability} and was not noticed by the participants.
|
||||
%
|
||||
The user study was held in a quiet room with no windows, with one light source of \qty{800}{\lumen} placed \qty{70}{\cm} above the table.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ The placement of the haptic textures was randomized before each trial.
|
||||
%
|
||||
Participants were instructed to look closely at the details of the visual textures and explore the haptic textures with a constant pressure and various speeds to find the haptic texture that best matched the visual texture, \ie choose the surface with the most coherent visual-haptic texture pair.
|
||||
%
|
||||
The texture names were never given or shown to prevent the use of visual or haptic memory of the textures, nor a definition of what roughness is was given, so as to let participants complete the task as naturally as possible, similarly to Bergmann Tiest \etal~\cite{bergmanntiest2007haptic}.
|
||||
The texture names were never given or shown to prevent the use of visual or haptic memory of the textures, nor a definition of what roughness is was given, so as to let participants complete the task as naturally as possible, similarly to Bergmann Tiest \etal~\autocite{bergmanntiest2007haptic}.
|
||||
|
||||
Then, participants performed the \emph{ranking task}, employing the same setup as the matching task and the same 9 textures.
|
||||
%
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user