Remove comments
This commit is contained in:
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ and \level{LF} was faster than \level{RB} (\p{0.03}).
|
||||
|
||||
On the number of contacts,
|
||||
a \LMM \ANOVA with by-participant random intercepts indicated two statistically significant effects:
|
||||
\factor{Positioning} (\anova{4}{3990}{15.1}, \pinf{0.001}, see \figref{results/Grasp-Contacts-Location-Overall-Means}) %
|
||||
\factor{Positioning} (\anova{4}{3990}{15.1}, \pinf{0.001}, see \figref{results/Grasp-Contacts-Location-Overall-Means})
|
||||
and \factor{Target} (\anova{3}{3990}{7.6}, \pinf{0.001}).
|
||||
Fewer contacts were made with \level{Opposite} than with \level{Fingertips} (\percent{-26}, \pinf{0.001}), \level{Proximal} (\percent{-17}, \pinf{0.001}), or \level{Wrist} (\percent{-12}, \p{0.002});
|
||||
but more with \level{Fingertips} than with \level{Wrist} (\percent{+13}, \p{0.002}) or \level{Nowhere} (\percent{+17}, \pinf{0.001}).
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user