Style
This commit is contained in:
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ Indeed, participants found the \level{None} and \level{Occlusion} renderings les
|
||||
To understand whether the participants' previous experience might have played a role, we also carried out an additional statistical analysis considering \VR experience as an additional between-subjects factor, \ie \VR novices vs. \VR experts (\enquote{I use it every week}, see \secref{participants}).
|
||||
We found no statistically significant differences when comparing the considered metrics between \VR novices and experts.
|
||||
|
||||
Interestingly, all visual hand renderings showed \response{Grip Apertures} very close to the size of the virtual cube, except for the \level{None} rendering (\figref{results/Grasp-GripAperture-Hand-Overall-Means}), with which participants applied stronger grasps, \ie less distance between the fingertips.
|
||||
All visual hand renderings showed \response{Grip Apertures} close to the size of the virtual cube, except for the \level{None} rendering (\figref{results/Grasp-GripAperture-Hand-Overall-Means}), with which participants applied stronger grasps, \ie less distance between the fingertips.
|
||||
Having no visual hand rendering, but only the reaction of the cube to the interaction as feedback, made participants less confident in their grip.
|
||||
This result contrasts with the wrongly estimated grip apertures observed by \textcite{al-kalbani2016analysis} in an exocentric VST-AR setup.
|
||||
Also, while some participants found the absence of visual hand rendering more natural, many of them commented on the importance of having feedback on the tracking of their hands, as observed by \textcite{xiao2018mrtouch} in a similar immersive OST-AR setup.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user