Style figures in visual-hand chapter
This commit is contained in:
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
|
||||
|
||||
\figref{results_questions} presents the questionnaire results for each visual hand rendering.
|
||||
Friedman tests indicated that all questions had statistically significant differences (\pinf{0.001}).
|
||||
Pairwise Wilcoxon signed-rank tests with Holm-Bonferroni adjustment were then used each question results (\secref{metrics}):
|
||||
Pairwise Wilcoxon signed-rank tests with Holm-Bonferroni adjustment were then used each question results:
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item \response{Difficulty}: \level{Occlusion} was considered more difficult than \level{Contour} (\p{0.02}), \level{Skeleton} (\p{0.01}), and \level{Mesh} (\p{0.03}).
|
||||
\item \response{Fatigue}: \level{None} was found more fatiguing than \level{Mesh} (\p{0.04}); And \level{Occlusion} more than \level{Skeleton} (\p{0.02}) and \level{Mesh} (\p{0.02}).
|
||||
@@ -24,12 +24,11 @@ Each visual hand rendering, except for \level{Occlusion}, had simultaneously rec
|
||||
Lower is better for \textbf{(a)} difficulty and \textbf{(b)} fatigue.
|
||||
Higher is better for \textbf{(d)} performance, \textbf{(d)} precision, \textbf{(e)} efficiency, and \textbf{(f)} rating.
|
||||
]
|
||||
\subfig[0.4]{results/Question-Difficulty}
|
||||
\subfig[0.4]{results/Question-Fatigue}
|
||||
\subfig[0.32]{results/Question-Difficulty}
|
||||
\subfig[0.32]{results/Question-Fatigue}
|
||||
\subfig[0.32]{results/Question-Precision}
|
||||
\par
|
||||
\subfig[0.4]{results/Question-Precision}
|
||||
\subfig[0.4]{results/Question-Performance}
|
||||
\par
|
||||
\subfig[0.4]{results/Question-Efficiency}
|
||||
\subfig[0.4]{results/Question-Rating}
|
||||
\subfig[0.32]{results/Question-Performance}
|
||||
\subfig[0.32]{results/Question-Efficiency}
|
||||
\subfig[0.32]{results/Question-Rating}
|
||||
\end{subfigs}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user