Style figures in visual-hand chapter

This commit is contained in:
2024-10-28 19:34:58 +01:00
parent 0d2e16f7b3
commit cd12783293
28 changed files with 48 additions and 51 deletions

View File

@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
\figref{results_questions} presents the questionnaire results for each visual hand rendering.
Friedman tests indicated that all questions had statistically significant differences (\pinf{0.001}).
Pairwise Wilcoxon signed-rank tests with Holm-Bonferroni adjustment were then used each question results (\secref{metrics}):
Pairwise Wilcoxon signed-rank tests with Holm-Bonferroni adjustment were then used each question results:
\begin{itemize}
\item \response{Difficulty}: \level{Occlusion} was considered more difficult than \level{Contour} (\p{0.02}), \level{Skeleton} (\p{0.01}), and \level{Mesh} (\p{0.03}).
\item \response{Fatigue}: \level{None} was found more fatiguing than \level{Mesh} (\p{0.04}); And \level{Occlusion} more than \level{Skeleton} (\p{0.02}) and \level{Mesh} (\p{0.02}).
@@ -24,12 +24,11 @@ Each visual hand rendering, except for \level{Occlusion}, had simultaneously rec
Lower is better for \textbf{(a)} difficulty and \textbf{(b)} fatigue.
Higher is better for \textbf{(d)} performance, \textbf{(d)} precision, \textbf{(e)} efficiency, and \textbf{(f)} rating.
]
\subfig[0.4]{results/Question-Difficulty}
\subfig[0.4]{results/Question-Fatigue}
\subfig[0.32]{results/Question-Difficulty}
\subfig[0.32]{results/Question-Fatigue}
\subfig[0.32]{results/Question-Precision}
\par
\subfig[0.4]{results/Question-Precision}
\subfig[0.4]{results/Question-Performance}
\par
\subfig[0.4]{results/Question-Efficiency}
\subfig[0.4]{results/Question-Rating}
\subfig[0.32]{results/Question-Performance}
\subfig[0.32]{results/Question-Efficiency}
\subfig[0.32]{results/Question-Rating}
\end{subfigs}