erwan/phd-thesis
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Typo

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Erwan Normand
2024-10-15 10:24:15 +02:00
parent 77fac7e11a
commit c343d89a78
2 changed files with 4 additions and 4 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
3-manipulation/visuo-haptic-hand/4-discussion.tex
View File

@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ Another reason could be the visual impairment caused by the vibrotactile motors
We observed different strategies than in the \chapref{visual_hand} for the two tasks.
During the \level{Push} task, participants made more and shorter contacts to adjust the cube inside the target volume (\figref{results/Push-Contacts-Location-Overall-Means} and \figref{results/Push-TimePerContact-Location-Overall-Means}).
During the \level{Grasp} task, participants pressed the cube \percent{25} harder on average (\figref{results/Grasp-GripAperture-Location-Overall-Means}).
During the \level{Grasp} task, participants pressed the cube \percent{25} harder on average (\figref{results/Grasp-GripAperture-Location-Overall-Means}).
The \level{Fingertips} and \level{Proximal} positionings led to a slightly larger grip aperture than the others.
We think that the proximity of the vibrotactile rendering to the point of contact made users to take more time to adjust their grip in a more realistic manner, \ie closer to the surface of the cube.
This could also be the cause of the higher number of failed grasps or cube drops: indeed, we observed that the larger the grip aperture, the higher the number of contacts.
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ Participants reported that this visual hand rendering provided good feedback on
However, many also felt that it was a bit redundant with the vibrotactile hand rendering.
Indeed, receiving a vibrotactile hand rendering was found by participants as a more accurate and reliable information regarding the contact with the cube than simply seeing the cube and the visual hand reacting to the manipulation.
This result suggests that providing a visual hand rendering may not be useful during the grasping phase, but may be beneficial prior to contact with the \VO and during position and rotation adjustment, providing valuable information about the hand pose.
It is also worth noting that the improved hand tracking and grasp helper improved the manipulation of the cube with respect to the \chapref{visual_hand}, as shown by the shorter completion time during the \level{Grasp} task.
It is also worth noting that the improved hand tracking and grasp helper improved the manipulation of the cube with respect to the \chapref{visual_hand}, as shown by the shorter completion time during the \level{Grasp} task.
This improvement could also be the reason for the smaller differences between the \level{Skeleton} and the \level{None} visual hand renderings in this second experiment.
In summary, the positioning of the vibrotactile haptic rendering of the hand affected on the performance and experience of users manipulating \VOs with their bare hands in \AR.