Better figures
This commit is contained in:
@@ -19,16 +19,16 @@ Although the Distance technique provided additional feedback on the interpenetra
|
||||
\subsection{Questionnaire}
|
||||
\label{questions}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{subfigswide}{questions}{%
|
||||
Experiment \#2. Boxplots of the questionnaire results of each vibrotactile positioning
|
||||
%
|
||||
and pairwise Wilcoxon signed-rank tests with Holm-Bonferroni adjustment: *** is \pinf{0.001}, ** is \pinf{0.01}, and * is \pinf{0.05}.
|
||||
}
|
||||
\subfig[0.24]{results/Question-Vibration Rating-Positioning-Overall}
|
||||
\subfig[0.24]{results/Question-Workload-Positioning-Overall}
|
||||
\subfig[0.24]{results/Question-Usefulness-Positioning-Overall}
|
||||
\subfig[0.24]{results/Question-Realism-Positioning-Overall}
|
||||
\end{subfigswide}
|
||||
\begin{subfigs}{results_questions}{Boxplots of the questionnaire results for each vibrotactile positioning. }[
|
||||
Pairwise Wilcoxon signed-rank tests with Holm-Bonferroni adjustment: *** is \pinf{0.001}, ** is \pinf{0.01}, and * is \pinf{0.05}.
|
||||
Higher is better for \textbf{(a)} vibrotactile rendering rating, \textbf{(c)} usefulness and \textbf{(c)} fatigue.
|
||||
Lower is better for \textbf{(d)} workload.
|
||||
]
|
||||
\subfig[0.24]{results/Question-Vibration Rating-Positioning-Overall}
|
||||
\subfig[0.24]{results/Question-Usefulness-Positioning-Overall}
|
||||
\subfig[0.24]{results/Question-Realism-Positioning-Overall}
|
||||
\subfig[0.24]{results/Question-Workload-Positioning-Overall}
|
||||
\end{subfigs}
|
||||
|
||||
\figref{questions} shows the questionnaire results for each vibrotactile positioning.
|
||||
%
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user