Better figures
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,21 +1,19 @@
|
||||
\subsection{Questionnaire}
|
||||
\label{questions}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{subfigswide}{questions}{%
|
||||
Experiment \#1. Boxplots of the questionnaire results of each visual hand rendering
|
||||
%
|
||||
and pairwise Wilcoxon signed-rank tests with Holm-Bonferroni adjustment: ** is \pinf{0.01} and * is \pinf{0.05}.
|
||||
%
|
||||
Lower is better for Difficulty and Fatigue. Higher is better for Precision, Efficiency, and Rating.
|
||||
}
|
||||
\subfig[0.19]{results/Question-Difficulty}
|
||||
\subfig[0.19]{results/Question-Fatigue}
|
||||
\subfig[0.19]{results/Question-Precision}
|
||||
\subfig[0.19]{results/Question-Efficiency}
|
||||
\subfig[0.19]{results/Question-Rating}
|
||||
\end{subfigswide}
|
||||
\begin{subfigs}{results_questions}{Boxplots of the questionnaire results for each visual hand rendering. }[
|
||||
Pairwise Wilcoxon signed-rank tests with Holm-Bonferroni adjustment: ** is \pinf{0.01} and * is \pinf{0.05}.
|
||||
Lower is better for \textbf{(a)} difficulty and \textbf{(b)} fatigue.
|
||||
Higher is better for \textbf{(c)} precision, \textbf{(d)} efficiency, and \textbf{(e)} rating.
|
||||
]
|
||||
\subfig[0.19]{results/Question-Difficulty}
|
||||
\subfig[0.19]{results/Question-Fatigue}
|
||||
\subfig[0.19]{results/Question-Precision}
|
||||
\subfig[0.19]{results/Question-Efficiency}
|
||||
\subfig[0.19]{results/Question-Rating}
|
||||
\end{subfigs}
|
||||
|
||||
\figref{questions} presents the questionnaire results for each visual hand rendering.
|
||||
\figref{results_questions} presents the questionnaire results for each visual hand rendering.
|
||||
%
|
||||
Friedman tests indicated that all questions had statistically significant differences (\pinf{0.001}).
|
||||
%
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user