erwan/phd-thesis
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Better figures

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Erwan Normand
2024-09-24 15:07:13 +02:00
parent 9ba5d344a5
commit b8b799df3d
18 changed files with 383 additions and 418 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

26
2-perception/xr-perception/4-results.tex
View File

@@ -34,22 +34,20 @@ The \level{Real} rendering had the lowest JND (\percent{26} \ci{23}{29}), the \l
%
All pairwise differences were statistically significant.
\begin{subfigs}{discrimination_accuracy}{%
Generalized Linear Mixed Model (GLMM) results in the vibrotactile texture roughness discrimination task, with non-parametric bootstrap 95\% confidence intervals.
}[%
\item Percentage of trials in which the comparison texture was perceived as rougher than the reference texture, as a function of the amplitude difference between the two textures and the visual rendering.
Curves represent predictions from the GLMM (probit link function) and points are estimated marginal means.
\item Estimated points of subjective equality (PSE) of each visual rendering.
%, defined as the amplitude difference at which both reference and comparison textures are perceived to be equivalent, \ie the accuracy in discriminating vibrotactile roughness.
\item Estimated just-noticeable difference (JND) of each visual rendering.
%, defined as the minimum perceptual amplitude difference, \ie the sensitivity to vibrotactile roughness differences.
]
\subfig[0.85]{results/trial_predictions}\\
\subfig[0.45]{results/trial_pses}
\subfig[0.45]{results/trial_jnds}
\begin{subfigs}{discrimination_accuracy}{Results of the vibrotactile texture roughness discrimination task. }[
Curves represent predictions from the GLMM model (probit link function), and points are estimated marginal means with non-parametric bootstrap 95\% confidence intervals.
][
\item Proportion of trials in which the comparison texture was perceived as rougher than the reference texture, as a function of the amplitude difference between the two textures and the visual rendering.
\item Estimated points of subjective equality (PSE) of each visual rendering.
%, defined as the amplitude difference at which both reference and comparison textures are perceived to be equivalent, \ie the accuracy in discriminating vibrotactile roughness.
\item Estimated just-noticeable difference (JND) of each visual rendering.
%, defined as the minimum perceptual amplitude difference, \ie the sensitivity to vibrotactile roughness differences.
]
\subfig[0.85]{results/trial_predictions}\\
\subfig[0.45]{results/trial_pses}
\subfig[0.45]{results/trial_jnds}
\end{subfigs}
\subsubsection{Response Time}
\label{response_time}