erwan/phd-thesis
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Complete vhar_system conclusion

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Erwan Normand
2024-10-01 11:18:32 +02:00
parent 53a45d62a7
commit afb96c7ff1
10 changed files with 55 additions and 51 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
2-perception/xr-perception/1-introduction.tex
View File

@@ -1,10 +1,8 @@
% Delivers the motivation for your paper. It explains why you did the work you did.
\noindent Most of the haptic augmentations of tangible surfaces using with wearable haptic devices, including roughness of textures (\secref[related_work]{texture_rendering}), have been studied without a visual feedback, and none have considered the influence of the visual rendering on their perception or integrated them in \AR and \VR (\secref[related_work]{texture_rendering}).
Still, it is known that the visual rendering of a tangible can influence the perception of its haptic properties (\secref[related_work]{visual_haptic_influence}), and that the perception of same haptic force-feedback or vibrotactile rendering can differ between \AR and \VR, probably due to difference in perceived simultaneity between visual and haptic stimuli (\secref[related_work]{ar_vr_haptic}).
Indeed, in \AR, the user can see their own hand touching, the haptic device worn and the \RE, while in \VR they are hidden by the \VE.
In this chapter, we investigate the \textbf{role of the visual virtuality} of the hand (real or virtual) and its environment (\AR or \VR) on the perception of a \textbf{tangible surface whose haptic roughness is augmented} with a wearable voice-coil device worn on the finger.
In this chapter, we investigate the \textbf{role of the visual virtuality} of the hand (real or virtual) and its environment (\AR or \VR) on the perception of a \textbf{tangible surface whose haptic roughness is augmented} with a wearable haptics.%voice-coil device worn on the finger.
To do so, we used the visuo-haptic system presented in \chapref{vhar_system} to render virtual vibrotactile patterned textures (\secref[related_work]{texture_rendering}) to augment the tangible surface being touched.% touched by the finger.% that can be directly touched with the bare finger.
We evaluated, in \textbf{user study with psychophysical methods and extensive questionnaire}, the perceived roughness augmentation in three visual rendering conditions: \textbf{(1) without visual augmentation}, in \textbf{(2) \OST-\AR with a realistic virtual hand} rendering, and in \textbf{(3) \VR with the same virtual hand}.
To control for the influence of the visual rendering, the tangible surface was not visually augmented and stayed the same in all conditions.

3
2-perception/xr-perception/6-conclusion.tex
View File

@@ -2,7 +2,8 @@
\label{conclusion}
In this chapter, we studied how the perception of wearable haptic augmented textures is affected by the visual virtuality of the hand and the environment, being either real, augmented or virtual.
Using the wearable visuo-haptic augmentation system presented in \chapref{vhar_system}, we rendered virtual vibrotactile patterned textures on the voice-coil worn on the middle-phalanx of the finger to augment the roughness perception of the tangible surface being touched.
Using the wearable visuo-haptic augmentation system presented in \chapref{vhar_system}, we augmented the perceived roughness of tangible surfaces with virtual vibrotactile textures rendered on the finger.
%we rendered virtual vibrotactile patterned textures on the voice-coil worn on the middle-phalanx of the finger to augment the roughness perception of the tangible surface being touched.
With an immersive \AR headset, that could be switched to a \VR only view, we considered three visual rendering conditions: (1) without visual augmentation, (2) with a realistic virtual hand rendering in \AR, and (3) with the same virtual hand in \VR.
We then evaluated the perceived roughness augmentation in these three visual conditions with a psychophysical user study involving 20 participants and extensive questionnaires.