erwan/phd-thesis
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Override subfigs commands

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Erwan Normand
2024-07-12 10:05:37 +02:00
parent 29523ed1f3
commit 913a35ef9d
11 changed files with 112 additions and 75 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

45
2-perception/xr-perception/4-results.tex
View File

@@ -36,20 +36,17 @@ All pairwise differences were statistically significant.
\begin{subfigs}{discrimination_accuracy}{%
Generalized Linear Mixed Model (GLMM) results in the vibrotactile texture roughness discrimination task, with non-parametric bootstrap 95\% confidence intervals.
%
(a) Percentage of trials in which the comparison texture was perceived as rougher than the reference texture, as a function of the amplitude difference between the two textures and the visual rendering.
%
}[%
\item Percentage of trials in which the comparison texture was perceived as rougher than the reference texture, as a function of the amplitude difference between the two textures and the visual rendering.
Curves represent predictions from the GLMM (probit link function) and points are estimated marginal means.
%
(b) Estimated points of subjective equality (PSE) of each visual rendering.
\item Estimated points of subjective equality (PSE) of each visual rendering.
%, defined as the amplitude difference at which both reference and comparison textures are perceived to be equivalent, \ie the accuracy in discriminating vibrotactile roughness.
%
(c) Estimated just-noticeable difference (JND) of each visual rendering.
\item Estimated just-noticeable difference (JND) of each visual rendering.
%, defined as the minimum perceptual amplitude difference, \ie the sensitivity to vibrotactile roughness differences.
}
\subfig[0.85]{results/trial_predictions}[]\\
\subfig[0.45]{results/trial_pses}[]
\subfig[0.45]{results/trial_jnds}[]
]
\subfig[0.85]{results/trial_predictions}\\
\subfig[0.45]{results/trial_pses}
\subfig[0.45]{results/trial_jnds}
\end{subfigs}
@@ -82,16 +79,14 @@ All pairwise differences were statistically significant: \level{Real} \vs \level
\begin{subfigs}{results_finger}{%
Boxplots and geometric means of response time at the end of a trial, and finger position and finger speed measures when exploring the comparison texture, with pairwise Tukey's HSD tests: * is \pinf{0.05}, ** is \pinf{0.01} and *** is \pinf{0.001}.
%
(a) Response time of a trial.
%
(b) Distance traveled by the finger in a trial.
%
(b) Speed of the finger in a trial.
}
\subfig[0.32]{results/trial_response_times}[]
\subfig[0.32]{results/trial_distances}[]
\subfig[0.32]{results/trial_speeds}[]
}[%
\item Response time of a trial.
\item Distance traveled by the finger in a trial.
\item Speed of the finger in a trial.
]
\subfig[0.32]{results/trial_response_times}
\subfig[0.32]{results/trial_distances}
\subfig[0.32]{results/trial_speeds}
\end{subfigs}
@@ -135,8 +130,8 @@ The vibrations were felt a slightly weak overall (\response{Vibration Strength},
\begin{subfigs}{question_plots}{%
Boxplots of responses to questions with significant differences and pairwise Wilcoxon signed-rank tests with Holm-Bonferroni adjustment: * is \pinf{0.05}, ** is \pinf{0.01} and *** is \pinf{0.001}.
}
\subfig[0.24]{results/questions_hand_ownership}[]
\subfig[0.24]{results/questions_hand_latency}[]
\subfig[0.24]{results/questions_hand_reference}[]
\subfig[0.24]{results/questions_hand_distraction}[]
\subfig[0.24]{results/questions_hand_ownership}
\subfig[0.24]{results/questions_hand_latency}
\subfig[0.24]{results/questions_hand_reference}
\subfig[0.24]{results/questions_hand_distraction}
\end{subfigs}