Résumé

3-perception/xr-perception/1-introduction.tex

@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Most of the haptic augmentations of real surfaces using with wearable haptic dev
 Still, it is known that the visual rendering of an object can influence the perception of its haptic properties (\secref[related_work]{visual_haptic_influence}), and that the perception of same haptic force-feedback or vibrotactile rendering can differ between \AR and \VR, probably due to difference in perceived simultaneity between visual and haptic stimuli (\secref[related_work]{ar_vr_haptic}).
 Indeed, in \AR, the user can see their own hand touching, the haptic device worn and the \RE, while in \VR they are hidden by the \VE.
 
-In this chapter, we investigate the \textbf{role of the visual virtuality} of the hand (real or virtual) and its environment (\AR or \VR) on the perception of a \textbf{real surface whose haptic roughness is augmented} with a wearable haptics. %voice-coil device worn on the finger.
+In this chapter, we investigate the \textbf{role of the visual feedback of the virtual hand and of the environment (real or virtual) on the perception of a real surface whose haptic roughness is augmented} with wearable vibrotactile haptics. %voice-coil device worn on the finger.
 To do so, we used the visuo-haptic system presented in \chapref{vhar_system} to render virtual vibrotactile patterned textures (\secref[related_work]{texture_rendering}) to augment the real surface being touched. % touched by the finger.% that can be directly touched with the bare finger.
 We evaluated, in \textbf{user study with psychophysical methods and extensive questionnaire}, the perceived roughness augmentation in three visual rendering conditions: \textbf{(1) without visual augmentation}, in \textbf{(2) \OST-\AR with a realistic virtual hand} rendering, and in \textbf{(3) \VR with the same virtual hand}.
 To control for the influence of the visual rendering, the real surface was not visually augmented and stayed the same in all conditions.