erwan/phd-thesis
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Better notation of software versions

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Erwan Normand
2025-04-09 15:06:26 +02:00
parent 7fe080351d
commit 85df9fe164
4 changed files with 4 additions and 4 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
3-perception/vhar-system/2-method.tex
View File

@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ In addition, the pose and size of the virtual textures were defined on the virtu
During the experiment, the system uses marker pose estimates to align the virtual models with their real world counterparts. %, according to the condition being tested.
This allows to detect if a finger touches a virtual texture using a collision detection algorithm (Nvidia PhysX), and to show the virtual elements and textures in real-time, aligned with the \RE, using the considered \AR or \VR headset.
In our implementation, the \VE is designed with Unity and the Mixed Reality Toolkit (MRTK)\footnoteurl{https://learn.microsoft.com/windows/mixed-reality/mrtk-unity}.
In our implementation, the \VE is designed with Unity (v2021.1) and the Mixed Reality Toolkit (v2.7)\footnoteurl{https://learn.microsoft.com/windows/mixed-reality/mrtk-unity}.
The visual rendering is achieved using the Microsoft HoloLens~2, an \OST-\AR headset with a \qtyproduct{43 x 29}{\degree} \FoV, a \qty{60}{\Hz} refresh rate, and self-localisation capabilities.
A \VST-\AR or a \VR headset could have been used as well.

2
3-perception/vhar-textures/2-experiment.tex
View File

@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ Nine \qty{5}{\cm} square cardboards with smooth, white melamine surface, arrange
Their poses were estimated with three \qty{2}{\cm} AprilTag fiducial markers glued on the surfaces grid.
Similarly, a \qty{2}{\cm} fiducial marker was glued on top of the vibrotactile actuator to detect the finger pose.
Positioned \qty{20}{\cm} above the surfaces, a webcam (StreamCam, Logitech) filmed the markers to track finger movements relative to the surfaces, as described in \secref[vhar_system]{virtual_real_alignment}.
The visual textures were displayed on the real surfaces using the \OST-\AR headset Microsoft HoloLens~2 running a custom application at \qty{60}{FPS} made with Unity 2021.1 and Mixed Reality Toolkit (MRTK) 2.7.2.
The visual textures were displayed on the real surfaces using the \OST-\AR headset Microsoft HoloLens~2 running a custom application at \qty{60}{FPS} made with Unity (v2021.1) and Mixed Reality Toolkit (v2.7).
A set of empirical tests enabled us to choose the best rendering characteristics in terms of transparency and brightness for the visual textures, that were used throughout the user study.
When a virtual haptic texture was touched, a \qty{48}{kHz} audio signal was generated using the rendering procedure described in \cite{culbertson2014modeling} from the corresponding \HaTT haptic texture model and the measured tangential speed of the finger (\secref[vhar_system]{texture_generation}).

2
3-perception/xr-perception/3-experiment.tex
View File

@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ It consisted of a \qtyproduct{300 x 210 x 400}{\mm} medium-density fibreboard (M
A single light source of \qty{800}{\lumen} placed \qty{70}{\cm} above the table fully illuminated the inside of the box.
Participants rated the roughness of the paper (without any texture augmentation) before the experiment on a 7-point Likert scale (1~=~Extremely smooth, 7~=~Extremely rough) as quite smooth (\mean{2.5}, \sd{1.3}).
The visual rendering of the virtual hand and environment was achieved using the \OST-\AR headset Microsoft HoloLens~2 (\secref[vhar_system]{virtual_real_alignment}) running at \qty{60}{FPS} a custom application made with Unity 2021.1 and Mixed Reality Toolkit (MRTK) 2.7.2.
The visual rendering of the virtual hand and environment was achieved using the \OST-\AR headset Microsoft HoloLens~2 (\secref[vhar_system]{virtual_real_alignment}) running at \qty{60}{FPS} a custom application made with Unity (v2021.1) and Mixed Reality Toolkit (v2.7).
An \OST-\AR headset was chosen over a \VST-\AR headset because the former only adds virtual content to the \RE, while the latter streams a real-time video capture of the \RE, and one of our objectives was to directly compare a \VE replicating a real one, not to a video feed that introduces many other visual limitations (\secref[related_work]{ar_displays}).
The \VE carefully reproduced the \RE, including the geometry of the box, textures, lighting, and shadows (\figref{renderings}, \level{Virtual}).