Adjust figures and tables

3-perception/xr-perception/3-experiment.tex

@@ -155,23 +155,3 @@ For all questions, participants were shown only labels (\eg \enquote{Not at all}
     \end{tabularx}
   \end{tabwide}
 }
-
-\begin{tab}[!htb]{questions2}
-  {NASA-TLX questions asked to participants after each \factor{Visual Rendering} block of trials.}
-  [
-    Questions were bipolar 100-points scales (0~=~Very Low and 100~=~Very High, except for Performance where 0~=~Perfect and 100~=~Failure).
-    Participants were shown only the labels for all questions.
-  ]
-  \begin{tabularx}{\linewidth}{p{0.13\linewidth} X}
-    \toprule
-    \textbf{Code}        & \textbf{Question}                                                                                                                         \\
-    \midrule
-    Mental Demand        & How mentally demanding was the task?                                                                                      \\
-    Temporal Demand      & How hurried or rushed was the pace of the task?                                                                                                           \\
-    Physical Demand      & How physically demanding was the task?                                                                                                                    \\
-    Performance          & How successful were you in accomplishing what you were asked to do?                                                                                       \\
-    Effort               & How hard did you have to work to accomplish your level of performance?                                                                                    \\
-    Frustration          & How insecure, discouraged, irritated, stressed, and annoyed were you?                                                                                     \\
-    \bottomrule
-  \end{tabularx}
-\end{tab}

3-perception/xr-perception/4-results.tex

@@ -83,25 +83,6 @@ Friedman tests were employed to compare the ratings to the questions (\tabref{qu
   \item \response{Hand Distraction}: the virtual hand was slightly distracting with the \level{Mixed} rendering (\num{2.1 \pm 1.1}) but not at all with the \level{Virtual} rendering (\num{1.2 \pm 0.4}, \p{0.004}).
 \end{itemize}
 
-Overall, participants' sense of control over the virtual hand was very high (\response{Hand Agency}, \num{4.4 \pm 0.6}), felt the virtual hand was quite similar to their own hand (\response{Hand Similarity}, \num{3.5 \pm 0.9}), and that the \VE was very realistic (\response{Virtual Realism}, \num{4.2 \pm 0.7}) and very similar to the real one (\response{Virtual Similarity}, \num{4.5 \pm 0.7}).
-The overall workload (mean NASA-TLX score) was low (\num{21 \pm 14}), with no statistically significant differences found between the visual renderings for any of the subscales or the overall score.
-
-The textures were also overall found to be very much caused by the finger movements (\response{Texture Agency}, \num{4.5 \pm 1.0}) with a very low perceived latency (\response{Texture Latency}, \num{1.6 \pm 0.8}), and to be quite realistic (\response{Texture Realism}, \num{3.6 \pm 0.9}) and quite plausible (\response{Texture Plausibility}, \num{3.6 \pm 1.0}).
-The vibrations were felt a slightly weak overall (\response{Vibration Strength}, \num{4.2 \pm 1.1}), and the vibrotactile device was perceived as neither distracting (\response{Device Distraction}, \num{1.2 \pm 0.4}) nor uncomfortable (\response{Device Discomfort}, \num{1.3 \pm 0.6}).
-
-Participants were mixed between feeling the vibrations on the surface or on the top of their finger (\response{Vibration Location}, \num{3.9 \pm 1.7}); the distribution of scores was split between the two poles of the scale with \level{Real} and \level{Mixed} renderings (\percent{42.5} more on surface or on finger top, \percent{15} neutral), but there was a trend towards the top of the finger in VR renderings (\percent{65} \vs \percent{25} more on surface and \percent{10} neutral), but this difference was not statistically significant neither.
-
-%\figwide{results/question_heatmaps}{%
-%
-%    Heatmaps of the questionnaire responses, with the median rating and the interquartile range in parentheses on each cell.
-%
-%    (Left) point Likert scale questions (1=Not at all, 2=Slightly, 3=Moderately, 4=Very, 5=Extremely).
-%
-%    (Middle) point Likert scale questions (1=Extremely A, 2=Moderately A, 3=Slightly A, 4=Neither A nor B, 5=Slightly B, 6=Moderately B, 7=Extremely B) with A and B being the two poles of the scale.
-%
-%    (Right)  Load Index (NASA-TLX) questionnaire (lower values are better).
-%}
-
 \begin{subfigs}{results_questions}{Boxplots of the questionnaire results for the virtual hand renderings.}[
     Pairwise Wilcoxon signed-rank tests with Holm-Bonferroni adjustment: * is \pinf{0.05}, ** is \pinf{0.01} and *** is \pinf{0.001}.
   ][
@@ -115,3 +96,43 @@ Participants were mixed between feeling the vibrations on the surface or on the
   \subfig[0.18]{results/questions_hand_reference}
   \subfig[0.18]{results/questions_hand_distraction}
 \end{subfigs}
+
+Overall, participants' sense of control over the virtual hand was very high (\response{Hand Agency}, \num{4.4 \pm 0.6}), felt the virtual hand was quite similar to their own hand (\response{Hand Similarity}, \num{3.5 \pm 0.9}), and that the \VE was very realistic (\response{Virtual Realism}, \num{4.2 \pm 0.7}) and very similar to the real one (\response{Virtual Similarity}, \num{4.5 \pm 0.7}).
+The overall workload (mean NASA-TLX score) was low (\num{21 \pm 14}), with no statistically significant differences found between the visual renderings for any of the subscales or the overall score.
+
+The textures were also overall found to be very much caused by the finger movements (\response{Texture Agency}, \num{4.5 \pm 1.0}) with a very low perceived latency (\response{Texture Latency}, \num{1.6 \pm 0.8}), and to be quite realistic (\response{Texture Realism}, \num{3.6 \pm 0.9}) and quite plausible (\response{Texture Plausibility}, \num{3.6 \pm 1.0}).
+The vibrations were felt a slightly weak overall (\response{Vibration Strength}, \num{4.2 \pm 1.1}), and the vibrotactile device was perceived as neither distracting (\response{Device Distraction}, \num{1.2 \pm 0.4}) nor uncomfortable (\response{Device Discomfort}, \num{1.3 \pm 0.6}).
+
+Participants were mixed between feeling the vibrations on the surface or on the top of their finger (\response{Vibration Location}, \num{3.9 \pm 1.7}); the distribution of scores was split between the two poles of the scale with \level{Real} and \level{Mixed} renderings (\percent{42.5} more on surface or on finger top, \percent{15} neutral), but there was a trend towards the top of the finger in VR renderings (\percent{65} \vs \percent{25} more on surface and \percent{10} neutral), but this difference was not statistically significant neither.
+
+\begin{tab}{questions2}
+  {NASA-TLX questions asked to participants after each \factor{Visual Rendering} block of trials.}
+  [
+    Questions were bipolar 100-points scales (0~=~Very Low and 100~=~Very High, except for Performance where 0~=~Perfect and 100~=~Failure), with increments of 5.
+    %Participants were shown only the labels for all questions.
+  ]
+  \begin{tabularx}{\linewidth}{l X}
+    \toprule
+    \textbf{Code}        & \textbf{Question}                                                                                                                         \\
+    \midrule
+    Mental Demand        & How mentally demanding was the task?                                                                                      \\
+    Temporal Demand      & How hurried or rushed was the pace of the task?                                                                                                           \\
+    Physical Demand      & How physically demanding was the task?                                                                                                                    \\
+    Performance          & How successful were you in accomplishing what you were asked to do?                                                                                       \\
+    Effort               & How hard did you have to work to accomplish your level of performance?                                                                                    \\
+    Frustration          & How insecure, discouraged, irritated, stressed, and annoyed were you?                                                                                     \\
+    \bottomrule
+  \end{tabularx}
+\end{tab}
+
+%\figwide{results/question_heatmaps}{%
+%
+%    Heatmaps of the questionnaire responses, with the median rating and the interquartile range in parentheses on each cell.
+%
+%    (Left) point Likert scale questions (1=Not at all, 2=Slightly, 3=Moderately, 4=Very, 5=Extremely).
+%
+%    (Middle) point Likert scale questions (1=Extremely A, 2=Moderately A, 3=Slightly A, 4=Neither A nor B, 5=Slightly B, 6=Moderately B, 7=Extremely B) with A and B being the two poles of the scale.
+%
+%    (Right)  Load Index (NASA-TLX) questionnaire (lower values are better).
+%}
+