Replace \citeauthorcite => \textcite

1-introduction/related-work/1-hands.tex

@@ -26,27 +26,27 @@ In VR, as the user is fully immersed in the virtual environment and cannot see t
 %
 It is known that the virtual hand representation has an impact on perception, interaction performance, and preference of users~\cite{prachyabrued2014visual, argelaguet2016role, grubert2018effects, schwind2018touch}.
 %
-In a pick-and-place task in VR, \citeauthorcite{prachyabrued2014visual} found that the virtual hand representation whose motion was constrained to the surface of the virtual objects performed the worst, while the virtual hand representation following the tracked human hand (thus penetrating the virtual objects), performed the best, even though it was rather disliked.
+In a pick-and-place task in VR, \textcite{prachyabrued2014visual} found that the virtual hand representation whose motion was constrained to the surface of the virtual objects performed the worst, while the virtual hand representation following the tracked human hand (thus penetrating the virtual objects), performed the best, even though it was rather disliked.
 %
 The authors also observed that the best compromise was a double rendering, showing both the tracked hand and a hand rendering constrained by the virtual environment.
 %
 It has also been shown that over a realistic avatar, a skeleton rendering (similar to \figref{hands-skeleton}) can provide a stronger sense of being in control~\cite{argelaguet2016role} and that minimalistic fingertip rendering (similar to \figref{hands-tips}) can be more effective in a typing task~\cite{grubert2018effects}.
 
-In AR, as the real hand of a user is visible but not physically constrained by the virtual environment, adding a visual hand rendering that can physically interact with virtual objects would achieve a similar result to the promising double-hand rendering of \citeauthorcite{prachyabrued2014visual}.
+In AR, as the real hand of a user is visible but not physically constrained by the virtual environment, adding a visual hand rendering that can physically interact with virtual objects would achieve a similar result to the promising double-hand rendering of \textcite{prachyabrued2014visual}.
 %
-Additionally, \citeauthorcite{kahl2021investigation} showed that a virtual object overlaying a tangible object in OST-AR can vary in size without worsening the users' experience nor the performance.
+Additionally, \textcite{kahl2021investigation} showed that a virtual object overlaying a tangible object in OST-AR can vary in size without worsening the users' experience nor the performance.
 %
 This suggests that a visual hand rendering superimposed on the real hand could be helpful, but should not impair users.
 
 Few works have explored the effect of visual hand rendering in AR~\cite{blaga2017usability, maisto2017evaluation, krichenbauer2018augmented, yoon2020evaluating, saito2021contact}.
 %
-For example, \citeauthorcite{blaga2017usability} evaluated a skeleton rendering in several virtual object manipulations against no visual hand overlay.
+For example, \textcite{blaga2017usability} evaluated a skeleton rendering in several virtual object manipulations against no visual hand overlay.
 %
 Performance did not improve, but participants felt more confident with the virtual hand.
 %
 However, the experiment was carried out on a screen, in a non-immersive AR scenario.
 %
-\citeauthorcite{saito2021contact} found that masking the real hand with a textured 3D opaque virtual hand did not improve performance in a reach-to-grasp task but displaying the points of contact on the virtual object did.
+\textcite{saito2021contact} found that masking the real hand with a textured 3D opaque virtual hand did not improve performance in a reach-to-grasp task but displaying the points of contact on the virtual object did.
 %
 To the best of our knowledge, evaluating the role of a visual rendering of the hand displayed \enquote{and seen} directly above real tracked hands in immersive OST-AR has not been explored, particularly in the context of virtual object manipulation.
 
@@ -61,11 +61,11 @@ wearable haptic devices~\cite{pacchierotti2016hring, lopes2018adding, pezent2019
 
 Wearable haptics seems particularly suited for this context, as it takes into account many of the AR constraints, \eg limited impact on hand tracking performance and reduced impairment of the senses and ability of the users to interact with real content~\cite{pacchierotti2016hring, maisto2017evaluation, lopes2018adding, meli2018combining, pezent2019tasbi, teng2021touch, kourtesis2022electrotactile, marchal2022virtual}.
 %
-For example, \citeauthorcite{pacchierotti2016hring} designed a haptic ring providing pressure and skin stretch sensations to be worn at the proximal finger phalanx, so as to improve the hand tracking during a pick-and-place task.
+For example, \textcite{pacchierotti2016hring} designed a haptic ring providing pressure and skin stretch sensations to be worn at the proximal finger phalanx, so as to improve the hand tracking during a pick-and-place task.
 %
-\citeauthorcite{pezent2019tasbi} proposed Tasbi: a wristband haptic device capable of rendering vibrations and pressures.
+\textcite{pezent2019tasbi} proposed Tasbi: a wristband haptic device capable of rendering vibrations and pressures.
 %
-\citeauthorcite{teng2021touch} presented Touch\&Fold, a haptic device attached to the nail that provides pressure and texture sensations when interacting with virtual content, but also folds away when the user interacts with real objects, leaving the fingertip free.
+\textcite{teng2021touch} presented Touch\&Fold, a haptic device attached to the nail that provides pressure and texture sensations when interacting with virtual content, but also folds away when the user interacts with real objects, leaving the fingertip free.
 %
 This approach was also perceived as more realistic than providing sensations directly on the nail, as in~\cite{ando2007fingernailmounted}.
 %
@@ -75,11 +75,11 @@ If it is indeed necessary to delocalize the haptic feedback, each of these posit
 
 Conjointly, a few studies have explored and compared the effects of visual and haptic feedback in tasks involving the manipulation of virtual objects with the hand.
 %
-\citeauthorcite{sarac2022perceived} and \citeauthorcite{palmer2022haptic} studied the effects of providing haptic feedback about contacts at the fingertips using haptic devices worn at the wrist, testing different mappings.
+\textcite{sarac2022perceived} and \textcite{palmer2022haptic} studied the effects of providing haptic feedback about contacts at the fingertips using haptic devices worn at the wrist, testing different mappings.
 %
 Results proved that moving the haptic feedback away from the point(s) of contact is possible and effective, and that its impact is more significant when the visual feedback is limited.
 %
-In pick-and-place tasks in AR involving both virtual and real objects, \citeauthorcite{maisto2017evaluation} and \citeauthorcite{meli2018combining} showed that having a haptic {rendering of the} fingertip interactions with the virtual objects led to better performance and perceived effectiveness than having only a visual rendering of the hand, similar to \figref{hands-tips}.
+In pick-and-place tasks in AR involving both virtual and real objects, \textcite{maisto2017evaluation} and \textcite{meli2018combining} showed that having a haptic {rendering of the} fingertip interactions with the virtual objects led to better performance and perceived effectiveness than having only a visual rendering of the hand, similar to \figref{hands-tips}.
 %
 Moreover, employing the haptic ring of~\cite{pacchierotti2016hring} on the proximal finger phalanx led to an improved performance with respect to more standard fingertip haptic devices~\cite{chinello2020modular}.
 %