erwan/phd-thesis
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Visual hand {rendering => augmentation}

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Erwan Normand
2024-11-04 14:37:23 +01:00
parent 613e683902
commit 5dc3e33a15
15 changed files with 93 additions and 79 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

6
4-manipulation/visual-hand/3-4-questions.tex
View File

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
\subsection{Questionnaire}
\label{questions}
\figref{results_questions} presents the questionnaire results for each visual hand rendering.
\figref{results_questions} presents the questionnaire results for each visual hand augmentation.
Friedman tests indicated that all questions had statistically significant differences (\pinf{0.001}).
Pairwise Wilcoxon signed-rank tests with Holm-Bonferroni adjustment were then used each question results:
\begin{itemize}
@@ -17,9 +17,9 @@ In summary, \level{Occlusion} was worse than \level{Skeleton} for all questions,
Results of \response{Difficulty}, \response{Performance}, and \response{Precision} questions are consistent in that way.
Moreover, having no visible visual \factor{Hand} rendering was felt by users fatiguing and less precise than having one.
Surprisingly, no clear consensus was found on \response{Rating}.
Each visual hand rendering, except for \level{Occlusion}, had simultaneously received the minimum and maximum possible notes.
Each visual hand augmentation, except for \level{Occlusion}, had simultaneously received the minimum and maximum possible notes.
\begin{subfigs}{results_questions}{Boxplots of the questionnaire results for each visual hand rendering.}[
\begin{subfigs}{results_questions}{Boxplots of the questionnaire results for each visual hand augmentation.}[
Pairwise Wilcoxon signed-rank tests with Holm-Bonferroni adjustment: ** is \pinf{0.01} and * is \pinf{0.05}.
Lower is better for \textbf{(a)} difficulty and \textbf{(b)} fatigue.
Higher is better for \textbf{(d)} performance, \textbf{(d)} precision, \textbf{(e)} efficiency, and \textbf{(f)} rating.