Visual hand {rendering => augmentation}
This commit is contained in:
@@ -11,10 +11,10 @@ Pairwise Wilcoxon signed-rank tests with Holm-Bonferroni adjustment were then us
|
||||
This good ranking of the \level{Skeleton} rendering for the Push task is consistent with the Push trial results.
|
||||
\item \response{Grasp task ranking}: \level{Occlusion} was ranked lower than \level{Contour} (\p{0.001}), \level{Skeleton} (\p{0.001}), and \level{Mesh} (\p{0.007});
|
||||
No Hand was ranked lower than \level{Skeleton} (\p{0.04}).
|
||||
A complete visual hand rendering seemed to be preferred over no visual hand rendering when grasping.
|
||||
A complete visual hand augmentation seemed to be preferred over no visual hand augmentation when grasping.
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{subfigs}{results_ranks}{Boxplots of the ranking for each visual hand rendering.}[
|
||||
\begin{subfigs}{results_ranks}{Boxplots of the ranking for each visual hand augmentation.}[
|
||||
Lower is better.
|
||||
Pairwise Wilcoxon signed-rank tests with Holm-Bonferroni adjustment: ** is \pinf{0.01} and * is \pinf{0.05}.
|
||||
][
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user