Add visual-hand chapter
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,22 +1,22 @@
|
||||
\subsubsection{Ranking}
|
||||
\label{3_ranks}
|
||||
\label{sec:ranks}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{subfigs}{3_ranks}{%
|
||||
\begin{subfigs}{ranks}{%
|
||||
Experiment \#1. Boxplots of the ranking (lower is better) of each visual hand rendering
|
||||
%
|
||||
and pairwise Wilcoxon signed-rank tests with Holm-Bonferroni adjustment:
|
||||
%
|
||||
** is \p[<]{0.01} and * is \p[<]{0.05}.
|
||||
** is \pinf{0.01} and * is \pinf{0.05}.
|
||||
}
|
||||
\subfig[0.24]{3-Ranks-Push}[Push Task]
|
||||
\subfig[0.24]{3-Ranks-Grasp}[Grasp Task]
|
||||
\subfig[0.24]{results/Ranks-Push}[Push Task]
|
||||
\subfig[0.24]{results/Ranks-Grasp}[Grasp Task]
|
||||
\end{subfigs}
|
||||
|
||||
\figref{3_ranks} shows the ranking of each visual hand rendering for the Push and Grasp tasks.
|
||||
\figref{ranks} shows the ranking of each visual hand rendering for the Push and Grasp tasks.
|
||||
%
|
||||
Friedman tests indicated that both ranking had statistically significant differences (\p[<]{0.001}).
|
||||
Friedman tests indicated that both ranking had statistically significant differences (\pinf{0.001}).
|
||||
%
|
||||
Pairwise Wilcoxon signed-rank tests with Holm-Bonferroni adjustment were then used on both ranking results (see \secref{3_metrics}):
|
||||
Pairwise Wilcoxon signed-rank tests with Holm-Bonferroni adjustment were then used on both ranking results (see \secref{metrics}):
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item \textit{Push Ranking}: Occlusion was ranked lower than Contour (\p{0.005}), Skeleton (\p{0.02}), and Mesh (\p{0.03});
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user