Typo visual hand

3-manipulation/visual-hand/3-1-push.tex

@@ -1,8 +1,7 @@
 \subsection{Push Task}
 \label{push}
 
-\subsubsection{Completion Time}
-\label{push_tct}
+\paragraph{Completion Time}
 
 On the time to complete a trial, there were two statistically significant effects: %
 \factor{Hand} (\anova{5}{2868}{24.8}, \pinf{0.001}, see \figref{results/Push-ContactsCount-Hand-Overall-Means}) %
@@ -14,8 +13,7 @@ Three groups of targets volumes were identified:
 (2) back and front \level{RB}, \level{F}, and \level{RF} were slower (\p{0.003});
 and (3) back \level{B} and \level{LB} targets were the slowest (\p{0.04}).
 
-\subsubsection{Contacts}
-\label{push_contacts_count}
+\paragraph{Contacts}
 
 On the number of contacts, there were two statistically significant effects: %
 \factor{Hand} (\anova{5}{2868}{6.7}, \pinf{0.001}, see \figref{results/Push-ContactsCount-Hand-Overall-Means}) %
@@ -27,8 +25,7 @@ This indicates how effective a visual hand rendering is: a lower result indicate
 
 Targets on the left (\level{L}, \level{LF}) and the right (\level{R}) were easier to reach than the back ones (\level{B}, \level{LB}, \pinf{0.001}).
 
-\subsubsection{Time per Contact}
-\label{push_time_per_contact}
+\paragraph{Time per Contact}
 
 On the mean time spent on each contact, there were two statistically significant effects: %
 \factor{Hand} (\anova{5}{2868}{8.4}, \pinf{0.001}, see \figref{results/Push-MeanContactTime-Hand-Overall-Means}) %