erwan/phd-thesis
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Conclusion xr_perception chapter

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Erwan Normand
2024-09-29 14:32:10 +02:00
parent 6e74bc17cb
commit 1c2a5c0c76
4 changed files with 27 additions and 42 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
2-perception/xr-perception/5-discussion.tex
View File

@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ Very interestingly, the evaluation of the vibrotactile device and the textures w
Conversely, the perceived latency of the virtual hand (\response{Hand Latency} question) seemed to be related to the perceived roughness of the textures (with the \PSEs).
The \level{Mixed} rendering had the lowest \PSE and highest perceived latency, the \level{Virtual} rendering had a higher \PSE and lower perceived latency, and the \level{Real} rendering had the highest \PSE and no virtual hand latency (as it was not displayed).
Our visuo-haptic augmentation system, described in \chapref{vhar_system}, aimed to provide a coherent visuo-haptic augmentation integrated with the \RE.
Our wearable visuo-haptic texture augmentation system, described in \chapref{vhar_system}, aimed to provide a coherent visuo-haptic renderings registered with the \RE.
Yet, it involves different sensory interaction loops between the user's movements and the visuo-haptic feedback (\figref{method/diagram} and \figref[introduction]{interaction_loop}), which may not feel to be in synchronized with each other or with proprioception.
%When a user runs their finger over a vibrotactile virtual texture, the haptic sensations and eventual display of the virtual hand lag behind the visual displacement and proprioceptive sensations of the real hand.
%