erwan/phd-thesis
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Add packages used for stats

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Erwan Normand
2025-04-09 15:06:51 +02:00
parent 85df9fe164
commit 1164bd0da6
4 changed files with 11 additions and 2 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

7
3-perception/vhar-textures/2-experiment.tex
View File

@@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ For each trial of the \level{Matching} task, the chosen \response{Haptic Texture
The \response{Completion Time} was also measured as the time between the visual texture display and the haptic texture selection.
For each modality of the \level{Ranking} task, the \response{Rank} of each of the visual, haptic, or visuo-haptic pairs of the textures presented was recorded.
\noindentskip After each of the two tasks, participants answered to the following 7-item Likert scale questions (1=Not at all, 7=Extremely):
After each of the two tasks, participants answered to the following 7-item Likert scale questions (1=Not at all, 7=Extremely):
\begin{itemize}
\item \response{Haptic Difficulty}: How difficult was it to differentiate the tactile textures?
\item \response{Visual Difficulty}: How difficult was it to differentiate the visual textures?
@@ -120,4 +120,7 @@ For each modality of the \level{Ranking} task, the \response{Rank} of each of th
\item \response{Uncomfort}: How uncomfortable was to use the haptic device?
\end{itemize}
\noindentskip In an open question, participants also commented on their strategy for completing the \level{Matching} task (\enquote{How did you associate the tactile textures with the visual textures?}) and the \level{Ranking} task (\enquote{How did you rank the textures?}).
In an open question, participants also commented on their strategy for completing the \level{Matching} task (\enquote{How did you associate the tactile textures with the visual textures?}) and the \level{Ranking} task (\enquote{How did you rank the textures?}).
\comans{JG}{I suggest to also report on [...] the software packages used for statistical analysis (this holds also for the subsequent chapters).}{This has been added to all chapters where necessary.}
The results were analyzed using R (v4.4) and the packages \textit{afex} (v1.4), \textit{ARTool} (v0.11), \textit{corrr} (v0.4), \textit{FactoMineR} (v2.11), \textit{lme4} (v1.1), and \textit{performance} (v0.13).

2
3-perception/xr-perception/3-experiment.tex
View File

@@ -118,6 +118,8 @@ After each \factor{Visual Rendering} block of trials, participants rated their e
They also assessed their workload with the NASA Task Load Index (\response{NASA-TLX}) questionnaire after each blocks of trials (\tabref{questions2}).
For all questions, participants were shown only labels (\eg \enquote{Not at all} or \enquote{Extremely}) and not the actual scale values (\eg 1 or 5) \cite{muller2014survey}.
The results were analyzed using R (v4.4) and the packages \textit{afex} (v1.4), \textit{ARTool} (v0.11), \textit{MixedPsy} (v1.2), \textit{lme4} (v1.1), and \textit{performance} (v0.13).
\newcommand{\scalegroup}[2]{\multirow{#1}{1\linewidth}{#2}}
\afterpage{
\begin{tabwide}{questions1}