WIP
This commit is contained in:
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ Moreover, having no visible visual \factor{Hand} rendering was felt by users fat
|
||||
Surprisingly, no clear consensus was found on \response{Rating}.
|
||||
Each visual hand rendering, except for \level{Occlusion}, had simultaneously received the minimum and maximum possible notes.
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{subfigs}{results_questions}{Boxplots of the questionnaire results for each visual hand rendering. }[
|
||||
\begin{subfigs}{results_questions}{Boxplots of the questionnaire results for each visual hand rendering.}[
|
||||
Pairwise Wilcoxon signed-rank tests with Holm-Bonferroni adjustment: ** is \pinf{0.01} and * is \pinf{0.05}.
|
||||
Lower is better for \textbf{(a)} difficulty and \textbf{(b)} fatigue.
|
||||
Higher is better for \textbf{(d)} performance, \textbf{(d)} precision, \textbf{(e)} efficiency, and \textbf{(f)} rating.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user